<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholics and the Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/</link>
	<description>YoungAdultCatholics - a blog of NextGen at Call To Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Schwantes</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Schwantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Today the PEW Forum on Religion and Public Life (http://religions.pewforum.org/) released the second part of its study on the Religious Landscape in America. As someone who finds these reports very informative on how our faith is received by the people, how religious life in America is working (or not working) to form Catholics as a community of the Body of Christ, and how pastoral ministers in the trenches (those of us who work in pastoral ministry, especially faith formation) can better help people come to know God through Scripture, Tradition and community life, I am concerned by the findings of this study. Here, I have copied the Pew Forum&#039;s findings on Catholics’ beliefs on the Bible:

&quot;Literal Interpretation of Scripture Among Catholics
23% Word of God, literally true word for word
39% Word of God, but not literally true word for word
27% Book written by men, not the word of God
11% Don&#039;t know/ refused/ other
Question wording: Which comes closest to your view? The Bible is the word of God, OR The Bible is a book written by men and is not the word of God? [IF BELIEVE THE BIBLE IS WORD OF GOD, ASK:] And would you say that The Bible is to be taken literally, word for word, OR not everything in The Bible should be taken literally, word for word?&quot;

As you can see, only 39% of Catholics gave an answer that aligns with the Catholic Church&#039;s way of reading Scripture. 23% hold a fundamentalist view. To be honest, I thought this would be higher than the 27% who do not believe that it is the Word of God at all, but both are problematic nonetheless.

Personally, I feel this shows that there is a lack in our faith formation of teens and adults on how to read the Bible and what Catholics believe about the Bible. John Paul II and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in their 1999 pastoral “Our Hearts were Burning Within Us” clearly state that catechesis must be focused on adults for it is they who are “capable of an adherence that is fully responsible (JPII in Catechesi Tradendae, 1979).” 

What are other people’s thoughts on the Pew Reports’ findings in relation to the Bible? Since it just came out, I am still processing its implications for parish faith formation ministry, so I would love to hear other insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the PEW Forum on Religion and Public Life (<a href="http://religions.pewforum.org/" rel="nofollow">http://religions.pewforum.org/</a>) released the second part of its study on the Religious Landscape in America. As someone who finds these reports very informative on how our faith is received by the people, how religious life in America is working (or not working) to form Catholics as a community of the Body of Christ, and how pastoral ministers in the trenches (those of us who work in pastoral ministry, especially faith formation) can better help people come to know God through Scripture, Tradition and community life, I am concerned by the findings of this study. Here, I have copied the Pew Forum&#8217;s findings on Catholics’ beliefs on the Bible:</p>
<p>&#8220;Literal Interpretation of Scripture Among Catholics<br />
23% Word of God, literally true word for word<br />
39% Word of God, but not literally true word for word<br />
27% Book written by men, not the word of God<br />
11% Don&#8217;t know/ refused/ other<br />
Question wording: Which comes closest to your view? The Bible is the word of God, OR The Bible is a book written by men and is not the word of God? [IF BELIEVE THE BIBLE IS WORD OF GOD, ASK:] And would you say that The Bible is to be taken literally, word for word, OR not everything in The Bible should be taken literally, word for word?&#8221;</p>
<p>As you can see, only 39% of Catholics gave an answer that aligns with the Catholic Church&#8217;s way of reading Scripture. 23% hold a fundamentalist view. To be honest, I thought this would be higher than the 27% who do not believe that it is the Word of God at all, but both are problematic nonetheless.</p>
<p>Personally, I feel this shows that there is a lack in our faith formation of teens and adults on how to read the Bible and what Catholics believe about the Bible. John Paul II and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in their 1999 pastoral “Our Hearts were Burning Within Us” clearly state that catechesis must be focused on adults for it is they who are “capable of an adherence that is fully responsible (JPII in Catechesi Tradendae, 1979).” </p>
<p>What are other people’s thoughts on the Pew Reports’ findings in relation to the Bible? Since it just came out, I am still processing its implications for parish faith formation ministry, so I would love to hear other insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfxdrummer</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>cfxdrummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Very well put, Josh! It&#039;s always important for us to remember that even though the Bible is a collection of books, it&#039;s still one Book! Good call.

As for my favorite translations, I enjoy using The Message as a supplimentary resource, but only after reading the passage in another translation - NAB is a personal favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put, Josh! It&#8217;s always important for us to remember that even though the Bible is a collection of books, it&#8217;s still one Book! Good call.</p>
<p>As for my favorite translations, I enjoy using The Message as a supplimentary resource, but only after reading the passage in another translation &#8211; NAB is a personal favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Schwantes</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Schwantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Josh- You are so right on with your analysis. I&#039;ve taken several Scripture courses, and that is exactly the way all of the theologians seem to introduce the Bible. I seems like you keep proving the point that you don&#039;t need a degree to be a theologian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh- You are so right on with your analysis. I&#8217;ve taken several Scripture courses, and that is exactly the way all of the theologians seem to introduce the Bible. I seems like you keep proving the point that you don&#8217;t need a degree to be a theologian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh McDonald</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I remember reading once, somewhere (I do remember that it was a Catholic source) that we can look at the totality of the Bible as a narrative of the development of Humanity&#039;s relationship to God.  That is, in the beginning God is viewed superstitiously -- as with any other Ancient deity, God can get moody and we mortals have to keep doing things to keep God happy and avoid punishment.  But gradually, Moses and the prophets come to see a very different sort of God with very different priorities.  And finally, Jesus brings us to a more complete understanding and a more intimate relationship with God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading once, somewhere (I do remember that it was a Catholic source) that we can look at the totality of the Bible as a narrative of the development of Humanity&#8217;s relationship to God.  That is, in the beginning God is viewed superstitiously &#8212; as with any other Ancient deity, God can get moody and we mortals have to keep doing things to keep God happy and avoid punishment.  But gradually, Moses and the prophets come to see a very different sort of God with very different priorities.  And finally, Jesus brings us to a more complete understanding and a more intimate relationship with God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Schwantes</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Schwantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I once heard the Bible compared to a beautiful woven tapestry that is best looked at when you can take in the whole of its beauty. Certainly, it is good to go up to the tapestry to look at individual aspects and even study how the artist crafted it, but once go around to the back of the tapestry and start pulling out the individual threads and pick it apart, the whole tapestry loses its elegance and its beauty. So too for the Bible; it is best read as a complete collection that if you begin ripping passages or verses out of the entire context and history to prove things or apply it to modern situations where it doesn&#039;t fit, then the whole of the Bible loses its beauty, power and meaning.

I realized that in my recommendation of one the study Bibles that I gave an incorrect title. For the New American Translation, I recommend The Catholic Study Bible edited by Donald Senior and John J. Collins published by Oxford University Press (this is the American version) or for the International version, The Catholic Bible, Personal Study Edition: New American Bible edited by Jean Marie Heisberger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once heard the Bible compared to a beautiful woven tapestry that is best looked at when you can take in the whole of its beauty. Certainly, it is good to go up to the tapestry to look at individual aspects and even study how the artist crafted it, but once go around to the back of the tapestry and start pulling out the individual threads and pick it apart, the whole tapestry loses its elegance and its beauty. So too for the Bible; it is best read as a complete collection that if you begin ripping passages or verses out of the entire context and history to prove things or apply it to modern situations where it doesn&#8217;t fit, then the whole of the Bible loses its beauty, power and meaning.</p>
<p>I realized that in my recommendation of one the study Bibles that I gave an incorrect title. For the New American Translation, I recommend The Catholic Study Bible edited by Donald Senior and John J. Collins published by Oxford University Press (this is the American version) or for the International version, The Catholic Bible, Personal Study Edition: New American Bible edited by Jean Marie Heisberger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate415</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>nate415</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Personally, I own a NAB, a Douay - Rhiems, and a NRSV- CE.  I have been reading the NRSV - CE the most, sometimes looking back to the DR for comparison, and occasionally referencing notes in the NAB, which, though not a study bible, has a lot more notes than either of the other two.  

I have actually been occasionally attending a nondenomenational bible study because I want to get more in depth into the Scriptures, but on the occasions that I go, I find the reflections on the daily mass readings in my Magnificat to be more valuable.  I have been trying to pinpoint the problem, and I think a lot of it has to do with taking small tidbits of a story and giving them broad applications.  

For example, the last one I attended, we looked at Acts Chapter 8 and the story of the Ethiopian Eunuch.  Part of the passage mentions Phillip being told by an angel to travel through the desert.  The leader of the study generalized this point exessively talking about how we are all called to travel long and potentially dangerous paths in God&#039;s name, and that we need to strike out on these paths at the moments notice, when we hear the whisper in our ear.  

I personally think they missed the broader point of the story that the Scriptures can be confusing and that we need an authority to help us understand them, which I think is one of the themes of the article Bishop Sklba wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I own a NAB, a Douay &#8211; Rhiems, and a NRSV- CE.  I have been reading the NRSV &#8211; CE the most, sometimes looking back to the DR for comparison, and occasionally referencing notes in the NAB, which, though not a study bible, has a lot more notes than either of the other two.  </p>
<p>I have actually been occasionally attending a nondenomenational bible study because I want to get more in depth into the Scriptures, but on the occasions that I go, I find the reflections on the daily mass readings in my Magnificat to be more valuable.  I have been trying to pinpoint the problem, and I think a lot of it has to do with taking small tidbits of a story and giving them broad applications.  </p>
<p>For example, the last one I attended, we looked at Acts Chapter 8 and the story of the Ethiopian Eunuch.  Part of the passage mentions Phillip being told by an angel to travel through the desert.  The leader of the study generalized this point exessively talking about how we are all called to travel long and potentially dangerous paths in God&#8217;s name, and that we need to strike out on these paths at the moments notice, when we hear the whisper in our ear.  </p>
<p>I personally think they missed the broader point of the story that the Scriptures can be confusing and that we need an authority to help us understand them, which I think is one of the themes of the article Bishop Sklba wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Schwantes</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Schwantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Bible Favorites? Depends on the use:

Study Bibles:
I definitely love my New Oxford Annotated with Apocrypha (Red cover, largish print-especially for the footnotes, NRSV translation). Its been with me for 6 years and the cover is now coming off, pages are falling apart, etc... Its been worth every penny for all of the course work and parish ministry its been through!

I also highly recommend the New American Bible: Study Edition. There is one edited by and has commentaries from U.S. theologians and one from an International onslaught of Bible Scholars. Both are good, but they are different.

Personal Prayer/Reflection:
I love the New Jerusalem Bible for its Psalms. the poetry is great, and it is still fairly close to the original meaning. I don&#039;t recommend it for study though, since the translation is old and does not necessarily convey the true meaning from the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek for much of the narratives.

I also love, love, love Psalms for Praying: An Invitation to Wholeness by Nan C. Merrill. She has taken the Psalms and re-worked them through for hearts and ears of modern people (especially women). The original psalms are a must, but this is great for group prayer when you don&#039;t want to interrupt with a lecture on culture and history or personal reflection...not to mention the images and poetry are gorgeous. Bishop Sklba&#039;s not a big fan, because it does deviate from the authentic translation, but he says as long as it is noted that they are inspired psalms and not a translation of their own,  its perfectly acceptable!

Lastly, my mentor and friend really likes the Serendipity Bible for personal prayer. I haven&#039;t really used it, but I completely trust his opinion on these matters. It has a personal bible study program and questions inlaid throughout it. It is NOT a study Bible, no footnotes for all the socio-cultural info, but it is nicely edited for reflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bible Favorites? Depends on the use:</p>
<p>Study Bibles:<br />
I definitely love my New Oxford Annotated with Apocrypha (Red cover, largish print-especially for the footnotes, NRSV translation). Its been with me for 6 years and the cover is now coming off, pages are falling apart, etc&#8230; Its been worth every penny for all of the course work and parish ministry its been through!</p>
<p>I also highly recommend the New American Bible: Study Edition. There is one edited by and has commentaries from U.S. theologians and one from an International onslaught of Bible Scholars. Both are good, but they are different.</p>
<p>Personal Prayer/Reflection:<br />
I love the New Jerusalem Bible for its Psalms. the poetry is great, and it is still fairly close to the original meaning. I don&#8217;t recommend it for study though, since the translation is old and does not necessarily convey the true meaning from the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek for much of the narratives.</p>
<p>I also love, love, love Psalms for Praying: An Invitation to Wholeness by Nan C. Merrill. She has taken the Psalms and re-worked them through for hearts and ears of modern people (especially women). The original psalms are a must, but this is great for group prayer when you don&#8217;t want to interrupt with a lecture on culture and history or personal reflection&#8230;not to mention the images and poetry are gorgeous. Bishop Sklba&#8217;s not a big fan, because it does deviate from the authentic translation, but he says as long as it is noted that they are inspired psalms and not a translation of their own,  its perfectly acceptable!</p>
<p>Lastly, my mentor and friend really likes the Serendipity Bible for personal prayer. I haven&#8217;t really used it, but I completely trust his opinion on these matters. It has a personal bible study program and questions inlaid throughout it. It is NOT a study Bible, no footnotes for all the socio-cultural info, but it is nicely edited for reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Ivory</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Ivory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-397</guid>
		<description>My mom and sister just saw this quote: &quot;Dusty Bibles lead to dirty lives&quot;.  But what if you have 10?  They&#039;re bound to get dusty right!?  ha.

I think it is wonderful that more people are embracing reading the Bible, and I really love the study bibles that give background information as well as some good translation and clarification for the confusing parts.  It makes it more accessible and hopefully less intimidating for some.   

Does anyone have a favorite translation?  I have really been loving the Message Bible (simplified and contemporary language, sometimes a little too simplified) and the New Living Translation (Jehovah&#039;s Witness translation).  They don&#039;t just give those out to anyone so I was super stoked to get one.  They&#039;re not Catholic bibles, so only for personal reflection but they really help me hear things in a new way and its so interesting to compare.  

For the ultimate parallel Bible resource, biblegateway.com is great.  Not many Catholic options however.  When I bought my first Bible I remembered searching forever for Catholic Bible tabs, which I could not find for the life of me.  Now they&#039;re fairly plentiful I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom and sister just saw this quote: &#8220;Dusty Bibles lead to dirty lives&#8221;.  But what if you have 10?  They&#8217;re bound to get dusty right!?  ha.</p>
<p>I think it is wonderful that more people are embracing reading the Bible, and I really love the study bibles that give background information as well as some good translation and clarification for the confusing parts.  It makes it more accessible and hopefully less intimidating for some.   </p>
<p>Does anyone have a favorite translation?  I have really been loving the Message Bible (simplified and contemporary language, sometimes a little too simplified) and the New Living Translation (Jehovah&#8217;s Witness translation).  They don&#8217;t just give those out to anyone so I was super stoked to get one.  They&#8217;re not Catholic bibles, so only for personal reflection but they really help me hear things in a new way and its so interesting to compare.  </p>
<p>For the ultimate parallel Bible resource, biblegateway.com is great.  Not many Catholic options however.  When I bought my first Bible I remembered searching forever for Catholic Bible tabs, which I could not find for the life of me.  Now they&#8217;re fairly plentiful I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfxdrummer</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>cfxdrummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-392</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the same way -- it wasn&#039;t until I studied theology in college andstarted taking my faith more seriously that I really dove into the Bible. But I&#039;ve immensely enjoyed my time in the Word, and the Holy Spirit has been a good companion to me, He&#039;s shown me a lot of new things in the Bible that I never saw before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the same way &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t until I studied theology in college andstarted taking my faith more seriously that I really dove into the Bible. But I&#8217;ve immensely enjoyed my time in the Word, and the Holy Spirit has been a good companion to me, He&#8217;s shown me a lot of new things in the Bible that I never saw before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate415</title>
		<link>http://youngadultcatholics-blog.com/2008/06/22/catholics-and-the-bible/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>nate415</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngadultcatholics.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Thanks for keying us into a great article.  You&#039;d think that converting from a solo scriptura background would prevent former protestant bible scholars from taking some things from the Bible too literal, especially in light of Tradition and the teaching of the Magisterium  that must have attracted them to the Catholic faith.

I have been reading Sacred Scripture regularly for the past four months, and have truely enjoyed hearing the Word of God sing to me from the page!  Before, even in Catholic school, I barely picked up a Bible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keying us into a great article.  You&#8217;d think that converting from a solo scriptura background would prevent former protestant bible scholars from taking some things from the Bible too literal, especially in light of Tradition and the teaching of the Magisterium  that must have attracted them to the Catholic faith.</p>
<p>I have been reading Sacred Scripture regularly for the past four months, and have truely enjoyed hearing the Word of God sing to me from the page!  Before, even in Catholic school, I barely picked up a Bible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
