Curious Cardinal George

I was reading National Catholic Reporter Online last Thursday when I winced in pain. My hometown cardinal, Francis George of Chicago, had made yet another boo-boo.

Jamie L. Manson, writing in “Young Voices,” quoted one of George’s recent columns in the Chicago archdiocesan Catholic New World. George thinks women who proclaim their “right” to ordination are confused. Priesthood is not a question of “the order of rights,” something in the civic realm to which one is legally due. Rather, the sacrament of holy orders is a matter of “the reality of gift,” something that “comes from love” and “is freely offered”…to men only.

But Manson, who knows how to connect dots, caught the cardinal with an almost audible “aha.” If this distinction between “rites and rights” is so important, why is Cardinal George so prominent in the anti-gay marriage movement? He is using “his religious and sacramental status to prevent individuals from receiving their rights in the civic order.” This is self-contradictory, if not hypocritical.

Cardinal George is like that. He sometimes says…things.

Jason Berry reports that in 2003, Chicago Sun Times reporter Cathleen Falsani asked the cardinal about a certain Delaware priest, Fr. Kenneth Martin, who pleaded guilty to sexual assault in 2001. Even after copping to the charge, he stayed at the cardinal’s residence and did liturgical consulting for the Chicago archdiocese. Why?

George turned it around on Falsani: “Are we saying that people with any kind of question in their past are not employable? Unless we want to say these people are simply permanent pariahs, is it appropriate to put his [Martin’s] life under scrutiny that way?”

He made it sound as if Martin got caught with a bag of pot and really needed a job at McDonald’s to get back on his feet.

Cardinal George was equally jarring when he spoke at my alma mater, Loyola University Chicago, in 2005. His topics were discipleship and social justice issues for young adults. One of my friends asked the cardinal how he could speak credibly, given the Church’s treatment of women and the LGBT community.

 George’s breathtaking response was this: “Women, homosexuals, thieves, males, whomever you want to say, should be equally respected. That doesn’t mean that everything everyone does is okay.”

Women, homosexuals, thieves. As Everybody Loves Raymond character Ray Barone once informed his brother Robert, “It’s like your mouth is falling down the stairs.”

It boggles my mind to recount all this because I like the cardinal. Really, I do. He was kind to me when it mattered.

In 1999, I was news editor for the paper at my Catholic high school, and Cardinal George presided at our all-school Mass. I asked our principal if the cardinal would let me interview him. She didn’t see why not.

After Mass, George toured the school and ended up in the library, where I waited with a mini-tape recorder. I shook his hand and asked if we could talk. He said of course. We sat down, and the cardinal waited with seemingly infinite patience while I tried to get the recorder to work (I’d never used one before).

I finally got it going. By now, George had acquired a plate of refreshments. We talked through his impressions of the school, the vocation crisis, and the upcoming Jubilee Year 2000 as he ate crab salad and bruschetta and drank diet Coke from a plastic cup.

The cardinal nodded sagely at every question and gave long, thoughtful answers, apparently in no hurry. He didn’t look over my head to see who else he should be talking to, even though by now the library was filling up with VIPs. They had to wait their turn, because I mattered.

When we finished, he nodded again and said he liked my questions. This was not disingenuousness or mere politeness. One of our exchanges, about whether society has a crisis of religion or a crisis of love, appeared in his column in the Catholic New World about a week later.

I was a student who had sprung upon George from nowhere in the middle of a public reception. But he treated me as though I had called in advance from CBS or NBC.

Still, I have come to realize that many bishops, including George, have the capacity to be disarmingly agreeable in some contexts and icily inconsiderate in others, especially if they feel at all challenged. This is not the mark of a pastor.

I do not ask of bishops that they be all things to all, but I do ask that they be the same person to all, with sensitivity as their keynote. I respect Francis George for how he interacted with me. I wish I could also respect him for consistently dealing the same way with others.

3 thoughts on “Curious Cardinal George

  1. I think that what you’ve happened upon here may be something that people on both sides need to take to heart: the people who disagree with us are not necessarily bad people. Based on your post, I disagree with many things that Cardinal George believes and practices. Yet, it doesn’t do anyone any good to demonize those who disagree with us, cathartic as that may feel in the short run. I used to think that those who feel women shouldn’t be priests and that GLBTQ individuals don’t deserve equal status in society truly had an underlying hatred/fear of these people. And I think that in many cases, that is true, regardless of how deeply buried those feelings may be. But I’ve also come to realize that there probably ARE many out there who DO believe they’re doing the “right thing” by towing the Church line on these issues. I wonder how Cardinal George actually interacts with GLBTQ individuals, for example. He may indeed be the same person to them — patient, thoughtful, etc. — despite the views he holds, and he may not see any contradiction in the way he treats them and the views he holds. Then again, he may not be — a friend once told me that I’d only get into trouble if I “expected human beings to be consistent.” It sounds like Cardinal George is just one more person who won’t easily fit into our prescribed package for him — which makes for a more nuanced struggle, but which doesn’t mean we should give up the fight. Thanks for sharing your personal experiences and thoughts.

  2. Justin Sengstock:

    You suggest in your post that the Cardinal’s position is theologically or logically inconsistent. I fail to see that connection. No one has a right to be ordained, it is a calling that is interpreted through the hierarchy. By the same token, the church does not “manufacture” the right to marriage. It simply recognizes the historical (and biblical) convention that marriage is between a man and a woman (as unfair as that might appear to a couple that is not heterosexual).

    That these two positions *appear* unfair does not mean that they are are unjust from the point of view of the faith. Nor are they inconsistent. The position of the church has been, in the west, from day one that only men are ordained as priests. In the east, women deacons are allowed and priests can get married. But ordaining women as priests or allowing male priests to legally marry has no precedent in the Roman church.

    In the case of same-sex marriage, perhaps church opposition to it seems unfair in this day and age. However, the church does not establish rules by checking which direction the wind blows. It has been doing a lot of things that seem strange to modern, secular society. It has been doing those things for two millenia, and fairly successfully at that.

  3. Pingback: Litany of the nuns « Young Adult Catholics

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s